A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their website, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal preparing disputes, the place views of The ocean are both of those hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable initiatives by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Moments. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-substantial drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture which has because develop into emblematic with the depth of the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble Visible proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Moments claimed, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water through extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the internet site grew to become One of the more striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions were being cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on no matter whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second while in the legal timeline.
Within the Main from the dispute is often a disagreement around boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as made, goes past what was approved and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, continues to be referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental protection and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have described Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair only trying to make a family property in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Particular Location of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed determined by Experienced assistance and accepted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into the sea through a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute more than construction of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as significantly widespread. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the Bodily truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an extreme technique.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be uncertain. The court have to ascertain if the wall as designed complies with setting up authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when basic troubles which include environmental protection and assets rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of all-natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. Whether or not it will eventually in the end be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.